News & Stories - AURA
Ottawa narrows the private path for settling refugees

Ottawa narrows the private path for settling refugees

News & Stories

Ottawa narrows the private path for settling refugees

Reposted from The Globe and Mail

“Yes, Canada needs to get better control of its immigration system, but let’s not lose track of our rich tradition of helping refugees. Their entry doesn’t always need to be managed by government – grassroots groups can help, and their strong interest shows these refugees have support to integrate here.

While it’s true that Canada can’t help all people in need during this time of increased global displacement, surely we can maintain our commitments to help refugees. The privately sponsored program remains one of the best ways to do it.”

Read the full op-ed here: The Globe and Mail

Canadian Anglicans push back against cuts to refugee sponsorship, foreign aid in announced federal budget

Reposted from The Anglican Journal

When Mimi Merrill fled to Canada in 2003 as a student and refugee from the Democratic Republic of Congo, it was 17 years before she saw her mother again.

Her mother was eventually able to make a brief visit to Canada. However, when Merrill applied for her mother to become a permanent resident of Canada through the Parents and Grandparents Program sponsorship visa, the application was denied. “I don’t know if I’ll see her again,” Merrill says.

Today, Merrill is refugee sponsorship coordinator for the Anglican diocese of Ontario—and one of many Anglicans across Canada speaking out against about cuts to refugee sponsorship and foreign aid in the latest federal budget announced Nov. 4, warning that these cuts will harm humanitarian efforts and even put lives at risk.

Continue Reading: The Anglican Journal

Sanctuary, support and a new life: Downtown East churches help refugees

“Syria, Iran, Cameroon, Eritrea and Afghanistan. These worlds and these people are prominent at the Cathedral Church of St. James on King Street East as its refugee committee marks its 10th anniversary in November.

In autumn 2015, images of drowned Syrian-Kurdish refu­gee child Alan Kurdi face down on a beach galvanized many people to try to help those fac­ing lives of unimaginable hor­ror. The Kurdi family reported­ly had hoped to reach Canada.

Rebecca McTaggart, co-chair of the St. James and Communi­ty Refugee Committee, says, “If you tell someone there are over 100 million displaced people in the world, it’s not particularly meaningful to them.”

Then she’ll tell the story of Bibi, a 71-year-old Afghan grandmother who was on her own, vulnerable to the Taliban – and brought to safety in To­ronto, to join her children and grandchildren.

McTaggart, a long-time di­rector-general of the Immigra­tion and Refugee Board, says, “It’s not often that you get to say you’ve changed somebody’s life in some sort of fundamental way.” They’re here because “the level of oppression or fear or vi­olence is such that they had no other choice. What we enable is for them to be able to start that new life in a new country, which is incredibly difficult.”

As part of the Diocese of To­ronto, and with a committee of ten to twelve people, St James works with the Anglican United Refugee Alliance (AURA), the sponsorship agreement hold­er. The process may take up to a few years, with delays from countries overseas. Once in Canada, refugees are sponsored for 12 months.”

Continue reading on The Bridge Community News

AURA continues to sponsor refugees

This article was originally published in The Anglican.

“Fritznel Richard intended to be with his family in the United States this past Christmas. Tragically, authorities found his body in Quebec near the notorious and illegal Roxham Road border crossing. Mr. Richard was trying to get back into the U.S. and instead died of hypothermia.

According to the CBC, Mr. Richard and his family had found their way to Canada from Haiti over a year ago. But because of federal and provincial delays in getting work permits and health coverage, his wife and one-year-old son returned to relatives in the U.S., again via Roxham Road. But Roxham Road did not work this time in late December. Knowing he was lost and freezing to death, he called his wife to say, “I love you,” and “Goodbye.”

We ask two questions. First, why do people take such huge risks? Whether it is the family of Syrian two-year-old Alan Kurdi, who washed up on the shore of a Greek beach in 2015, or the Patel family of four, who froze to death near the U.S. border in Manitoba last January, what drives people to take such life and death risks? Intuitively, we might know the reasons; they want for their children what we have: health, safety, security and education – in short, hope for a future. These are migrants. And then there are refugees. The difference between migrants and refugees is that refugees can’t go home. Refugees have been driven out. The UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) estimates that global forced displacement reached 103 million people by the middle of last year; this includes more than 32 million refugees. Families like the Richards, Kurdis and Patels leave their homes for a myriad of reasons. Refugees are driven out and flee for their lives. It doesn’t take a clairvoyant to see that the global refugee crisis is only going to deepen.

Second, individuals and families seeking hope and a home in Canada take such risks to leave because of frustration with the Canadian immigration procedures. The bureaucracy in Canada seems not only unjust but deathly slow. As of last September, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) reported more than 900,000 refugees are in the backlog. It seems that the IRCC is critically under-resourced.

In the midst of this, it is mystifying why the IRCC has made things more difficult for Sponsorship Agreement Holders (SAH) or SAH-organizations who are authorized to resettle overseas refugees. The IRCC has just laid out new and detailed eligibility criteria: all Sponsorship Agreement Holders must be able to demonstrate that they can monitor their caseloads, prove financial viability, be properly trained, and have a detailed operations structure, among other things. We would agree that such accountability is essential when dealing with the globe’s most vulnerable people. Yet we are perturbed to read that such regulations are forcing smaller Sponsorship Agreement Holders to shut down.

In particular, a Jan. 17 article in The Toronto Star alarmed Anglicans in the Diocese of Toronto when it pictured Bishop Anna Greenwood-Lee of the Diocese of British Columbia. Bishop Greenwood-Lee is concluding her diocese’s status as a Sponsorship Agreement Holder, citing the heavy bureaucracy of the IRCC’s new rules. Anglicans of the Diocese of Toronto have asked, “Well, what about us? We know we have a robust sponsorship commitment. Are we having to close down our work, too?” The answer is no. The Anglican United Refugee Alliance (AURA) can manage the new IRCC requirements. In our diocese, churches sponsoring refugees are supported by AURA. AURA has already submitted all the required documentation to the IRCC. So in our diocese, there is no need for concern.

AURA is the go-to organization for assisting Diocese of Toronto churches in our ministry of sponsoring the world’s refugees, as we are called to do by Jesus’ commandments to love our neighbour and welcome the stranger. AURA has a full-time operations director, a full-time sponsorship director, and a part-time sponsorship assistant. Further, AURA has an active working board of eight directors. Last year, AURA worked with more than 750 people in 50 Anglican parishes and 84 active sponsor groups to welcome 323 refugees to Canada. Moreover, these new residents were properly supported, cared for, and loved. The IRCC continues to recognize AURA’s competency and increases annually the number of sponsorships we can hold. AURA’s board and staff are currently conducting a review of our policies and procedures to increase our capacity.

With climate change gripping the planet and war seizing nations, the need for increased Sponsorship Agreement Holders is here, but clear oversight, monitoring and supervision are a necessity. Canada needs to think hard about how it can increase the capacity of SAHs. It needs to welcome refugees in a timely way. And AURA is thinking about how we can support smaller SAHs. We need to continue to work with the IRCC to increase the Canadian capacity to welcome refugees safely to a new home.”

Avoid conflict escalation

Summary: This resource is adapted from Motivational Interviewing (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). It provides a tool to help you avoid conflict escalation and the buildup of resentment. This informational resource can be easily read individually. Introduction: As your sponsorship group and the newcomer family partner to set up ESL, search for employment, access resources etc., you might have to balance knowing much more about the options available to the individual or family and honouring the individual or family’s preferences. Balancing both in conversations can be challenging and lead to unintended conflict.

One way to prevent conflict from escalating is to routinely take the pulse of the conversation. Consider asking yourself the following question taken from Motivational Interviewing (Miller & Rollnick, 2013): Does the conversation feel more like dancing or wrestling? Another way to ask is; “Does it feel like we’re on the same team, or on opposing teams?”

It might seem obvious or simple, but regularly checking in with and responding to the dynamics of the conversation can help prevent resentment from building up.

In dancing, ‘one moves with rather than against the person.” Wrestling is “a process of overpowering and pinning an adversary.” (Miller & Rollnick, 2013, p. 15).

Example signs:

When it feels like dancing, you might notice:

  • You’re trying hard to understand the other person’s point of view
  • You’re asking questions before making up your mind
  • You’re being honest about your concerns and stake in the issue and are acknowledging their concerns and stake in the issue
  • You’re agreeing with each other
  • Your posture is relaxed; you feel at ease

When it feels like wrestling (or being on opposing teams), you might notice:

  • You’ve stopped listening to what the other person is saying and are instead preparing your next response
  • You’re making assumptions about what the other person wants
  • You’re judging the other person or their decision
  • You feel very tied to and are pushing for a specific outcome
  • You’re unwilling to entertain a different opinion
  • Your jaw is clenched, shoulders raised/ you’re physically bracing for an argument

Practice: To develop the practice of taking the pulse of the conversation, take time to notice how it feels when you’re “dancing” and how it feels when you’re “wrestling” when trying to make a decision in your group or outside of it. Once you’ve identified those cues that indicate that you’re dancing or wrestling, look for them when you’re having conversations with the individual/family about ESL, jobs, etc.

What to do if the conversation feels more like wrestling

  • Name it. Try to be honest and clear about your concerns. Mention what you’re noticing in the conversation and reinforce your desire to work together:
    For example: “I’m starting to feel like I’m pushing you toward this specific ESL class that you might not be as certain about. I want to make sure that the classes we’re helping you enroll in are the ones you want to attend. English classes are really important, and they’re something I committed to help you access, but I also care about doing what works best for you.
  • Ask. Although it does not always yield accurate answers (because of the power differential), asking about the newcomer’s experience in the conversation can help. Using the example above, a simple question could be; “I’m worried I’m pushing you toward one class over another. Does it feel like that to you?”
  • Take a break. Just like in any challenging conversation, taking a break can reduce intensity and provide an opportunity to redirect the conversation’s focus.
  • Use other conflict management skills. Check out other trainings on engaging conflict productively, which are included in this section.

Communication Styles Activity

Description: This activity invites your group to experience different communication styles through an interactive game.

Instructions: Even if there are no linguistic barriers, clear communication can be complicated by differences in social and cultural etiquette, personal body language, past experiences, and more. To explore this phenomenon, have one member of the group pass out a Communication Style slip (included below) to each group member.

Style A

Follow these directions:

  • Avoid eye contact when speaking
  • Do not show any emotion or react when another group member is speaking
  • Speak more softly than you normally would

Style B

Follow these directions:

  • Sit or stand a few inches closer to the person next to you than usual
  • Gesture often when speaking

Style C

Follow these directions:

  • Speak louder than you normally would
  • Frequently interrupt other group members when they are speaking
  • Initiate conversation by asking a lot of questions (including fairly personal ones)

Style D

Follow these directions:

  • Do not interrupt other group members when they are speaking
  • Silently count to six before responding to another group member
  • Do not initiate conversation or ask questions
  1. Make sure to hand out a different Communication Style to each group member if possible.
  2. Without sharing the instructions on their slip with the rest of the group, each member should review their Communication Style.
  3. Once each group member has reviewed their instructions, begin a conversation. You may wish to choose a conversation topic beforehand, or a conversation topic may emerge naturally
  4. When it seems like the conversation is dying down, ask a volunteer from Style A to read the instructions for their Communication Style out to the group.
  5. When the volunteer from Style A has finished speaking, ask the group what they noticed about their reactions to the Style A type of communication. What did you find challenging? What did you notice about your reactions?
  6. Repeat for each of the Communication Styles.
  7. When everyone has had a chance to share, discuss how differences in communication styles can create challenges for effective support.

Create a Group Contract

Summary: This exercise asks you to reflect on, and then discuss, your expectations of, goals for, and contributions to the group. It then outlines steps to create a contract.

Introduction: Every member brings different personalities, expectations and expertise to the sponsorship group. Past groups have mentioned that a group of 8-12 core members and a surrounding team of volunteers works well. Groups have also attested to the benefit of using a formal agreement to help divide responsibilities between core members and maintain a balanced workload throughout the year.

Instructions:

  • Consider the following questions individually, then discuss as a group:
    • What would a successful sponsorship look like for you? What would you point to at Month 13 to know that, on the whole, the sponsorship had gone well?
    • How much time do you expect to commit? Would you like to be a point-person for the newcomers’ daily concerns?
  • Take out or draw a copy of the Contract Table below. Working individually, fill out the table using the following steps.
  • In the left-hand column entitled, Availability, write down what times you expect to be available throughout the sponsorship. Be as specific as possible. Daytime availability is especially important as many appointments occur during the daytime.
  • In the next column, entitled Resources, write down what kind of resources you have that will be applicable to sponsorship. Ex. a van, connections to community groups.
  • In the column labeled Skills, write down what kind of skills you would like to contribute and roles you would like to play. Examples include interpretation and language skills, driving, social media, public speaking, advocacy, volunteer coordination, budget tracking, activity organizing.
  • Leave the responsibility section blank for when your group delineates responsibilities based on the balance of resources, availability, and skill sets which emerge.
  • Once you have filled out the Contract Table individually, discuss it as a group.
  • As a group, fill out the responsibility part of the tables. Certain skill sets will be utilized more frequently than others (e.g. interpretation, driving, appointment accompaniment) and will need to be assigned to more group members. Different cultural practices or religions might also affect who is able to fill each role. For example, in certain cultures, women cannot be accompanied (to appointments) by a man who is not a relative.
  • Revisit your goals and expectations for a successful sponsorship. Does the agreement you’ve created enable you to achieve your goals? What additional support, if any, do you need to source before the newcomer(s) arrive. How and when will you evaluate your progress and needs throughout the 12-month period?

Responding to Burnout

Summary: This resource offers 1) a set of questions you can ask to prevent burnout on an individual level and 2) a set of institutional conditions that help prevent burnout.

Individual actions questionnaire

  • What tasks can you say no to?
  • What can you drop off your plate?
  • What life-giving physical activity can you do?
  • What can you do to ensure you get enough sleep tonight?
  • What nutritious and tasty food can you enjoy today?
  • What restorative activities/ hobbies can you engage in today?
  • What progress have you made in your sponsorship that you can celebrate?
  • Can you plan for a day off soon?
  • Can you access training and skills in areas of sponsorship you feel ill-equipped to address?
  • Do I need to access professional help (see my doctor, find a therapist)?
  • How can other group members support you right now?

Develop a Burnout Scale

Summary: This exercise walks you through the creation of a personalized burnout and restoration scale. The scale is a tool that can help you better notice and prevent significant stress and burnout in your sponsorship year. This exercise can be done as a group or individually. You will need to print off or draw the graduated scale below.

Directions:

  • This exercise will ask you to imagine how it feels at each point on the scale, at green, yellow, and red. First, start at the red area, at the bottom of the scale. How might you recognize you’re at a red point (not doing well at all, at a 0 or 1 on a scale from 1-10)? What are the thoughts, emotions, and/or physical cues you experience at red? What habits or behaviours do you engage in? What might someone close to you notice about you when you’re at a red point ? Write these things down to the left of the scale in the red area in the box provided for you. If you run out of space, please feel free to write outside the box.
  • Below the scale, try to brainstorm any activities or behaviours that would move you toward a yellow or green. It is possible, and even likely, that not all activities that restore you when you’re feeling okay are accessible to you when you’re at a red point. What would be restorative for you while at this point? Jot these things down in the box to the right of the scale.
  • Next, jump up to the green area. How do you know you’re at a green point (feeling great, at a 9-10 on a scale from 1-10)? Are there any particular actions you do, or physical cues, emotions, or thoughts you experience? What might someone close to you notice about you? Jot down any of these thoughts, emotions, physical signs, and behaviors in the green area, to the left of the scale.
  • To the right of the green part of the scale, mark down any activities and behaviors you engage in that help you maintain green. Another way to think about this is to ask yourself these questions: Which activities or habits, if I were unable to engage in them, would move me down the scale to yellow or red? Which activities, if interrupted or inaccessible to me, would impact my wellbeing? Jot them down.
  • Finally, move to the yellow part of the scale. You might be wondering why this exercise asks you to move to yellow last. For some, it can be challenging to notice our ‘in between’ experiences, when we’re not feeling great, but we’re also not feeling terrible. One goal of this exercise is to better equip you to notice the ‘yellow’ signs and respond before you progress to a red. (You may also wish to add additional lines at other points of the scale.)
  • Turning back to the yellow part of the scale; how do you know you’re at a yellow? What are the thoughts, emotions, and/or physical cues you experience at a yellow point? What habits or behaviours do you engage in? What might someone close to you notice? Write these things down to the left of the scale.
  • Below the scale, try to brainstorm any activities or behaviours that would restore you to a yellow point. It’s possible, and even likely, that not all activities that maintain you at green will be accessible to you or helpful to you when you’re at a yellow point. What would be restorative for you at a yellow point? Jot these things down to the right of scale.

Reflect independently, or as a group, on the following questions:

  • How was the experience of making the scale?
  • What about the process was helpful?
  • Were any restorative activities accessible to you at some but not all colour points?
  • What about your scale was expected or unexpected?
  • How might you use your scale in the sponsorship year?